[Postscript]


Interannual Variation of the East Asian Summer Monsoon
and Possible Forcing Mechanisms


Chung-Kyu Park
Korea Meteorological Administration
1 Songwol-dong, Chongno-gu
Seoul 110-101, Korea



Editor's Note: This paper was presented at the 2nd International Workshop on the East Asian Monsoon, 21-22 October 1996, Seoul, Korea. The author cordially allowed to republish it for the AMON by adding an abstract.



ABSTRACT

During the summer of 1994, East Asian countries (Korea, Japan and China) experienced record-breaking heat and drought conditions. The absence of the summer monsoon rainfall resulted in a severe water shortage in agriculture and industry over the highly populated regions of Korea, Japan, and central China throughout the year. This study documents the unusual evolution of the East Asian circulation during the summer of 1994 using the NASA/Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-1) assimilated data.

The results show that the abnormal evolution of the seasonal cycle, which is associated with the early development of the upper level anticyclonic flow over East Asia, is responsible for the absence of the middle latitude monsoon rainfall (Changma in Korea and Baiu in Japan) during July. This study suggests useful long-range predictions of the middle latitude monsoon rest on our ability to predict the occurrence of the Eurasian waves and their interaction with orography.




1. Introduction

The Asian summer monsoon has a profound social and economic impact in East Asia and its surrounding countries. While the monsoon evolution is largely phase-locked with the seasonal cycle, the recent devastating drought over the East Asian countries in the summer of 1994, in particular, highlights the range of variability in the progress of the monsoon. During the summer of 1994, East Asian countries (Korea, Japan and China) experienced record-breaking heat and drought conditions. The absence of the summer monsoon rainfall resulted in a severe water shortage in agriculture and industry over the highly populated regions of Korea, Japan, and central China throughout the year. The forcing mechanisms responsible for such an extreme failure of the monsoon are yet to be understood.

Analyses produced at the operational weather forecast centers have been an important tool for climate research. One of the most difficult problems often encountered in using the operational analysis data, however, is the spurious variations in the analysis data introduced by frequent changes and improvement of the numerical weather prediction systems. Reanalysis with nonvarying analysis/forecast system, for this reason, has become an important subject with the hope that it will resolve the problems with the operational analyses. The Data Assimilation Office (DAO) in the Goddard Laboratory for Atmospheres has recently produced a multi-year global assimilated data set employing a fixed data assimilation system. The GEOS-1 (Goddard Earth Observing System Version-1) assimilated data are used to document the large-scale circulation associated with the drought, and to understand the physical mechanisms responsible for the drought. This study will address the following questions concerning the East Asian drought: (1) What are the roles of tropical and middle latitude sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies? (2) What is the importance of the Tibetan Plateau? (3) To what extent are the East Asian anomalies connected with the hemispheric scale circulation anomalies?


2. The GEOS Data Assimilation System

The main components of the GEOS data assimilation system are an atmospheric general circulation model (GCM) (Takacs et al. 1994; Suarez and Takacs 1995) and a 3-dimensional, multivariate optimal interpolation (OI) scheme (Pfaendtner et al. 1995). The OI analysis scheme is carried out at a horizontal resolution of 2 degree latitude by 2.5 degree longitude at 14 upper-air pressure levels and at sea level. The upper-air analyses of height, wind and moisture incorporate the data from rawinsondes, dropwindsondes, rocketsondes, aircraft winds, cloud tracked winds, and thickness from the historical TIROS-N (Television Infrared Observation Satellite) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) soundings produced by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration (NOAA) National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS). The GEOS GCM uses the potential enstrophy and energy-conserving horizontal differencing scheme on a C-grid. The infrared and solar radiation parameterizations follow closely those described by Harshvardhan et al. (1987). The penetrative convection originating in the boundary layer is parameterized using the Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert (RAS) scheme (Moorthi and Suarez, 1992).


3. Circulation Anomalies

Figure 1 shows the 200 mb eddy height anomalies for July 1994. The stationary wave pattern is characterized by positive anomalies over East Asia, central North Pacific, western North America, northeastern Canada, and Scandinavia. This persistent anomaly pattern was blamed for the record-breaking summer heat waves particularly over East Asia and northern Europe. In June of 1994, the stationary wave pattern was not much different from the climatology over East Asia. In July, however, the strong ridge pattern over East Asia resembles the August climatology suggesting that the seasonal cycle over East Asia jumped from June to August, and skipped July which is the most crucial period for the rainfall over East Asia.

Fig. 1. The 200 mb eddy height anomalies for July 1994. Contour interval is 20 m. The values greater than 40 m are shaded. The zero contours are not drawn.


4. Interannual variability

In this section we examine the entire nine year record available from the GEOS-1 assimilation to determine how the 1994 East Asian summer anomalies compare with previous years. The underlying hypothesis is that the 1994 anomalies are an extreme example of fluctuations in the seasonal cycle that occur on a more frequent basis. We focus on the zonal wind fluctuations and use an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis to provide an index of the circulation variability. Figure 2a shows the dominant EOF of the July and August zonal wind averaged for the sector 90°E-120°W longitude for the years 1985-93. This mode accounts for 45% of the variance.

Figure 2b shows the evolution of the first zonal wind EOF during July and August for 1985-93. The July value for 1994 is the projection of the 1994 wind anomaly onto the EOF computed from the previous nine years. The variation occurs at low frequency with positive values occurring prior to 1986, between 1988 and 1991, and again in 1994. Figure 2c shows the variation of the central North Pacific SST anomalies over the same time period. The correspondence with the zonal wind variation is quite remarkable, suggesting a strong link between zonal wind changes and SSTs.

Fig. 2. (a) The first EOF pattern of u-wind averaged in the East Asian/Pacific sector (90°E-150°W), (b) its corresponding coefficients, and (c) SST anomalies over the central North Pacific. Units are in degree in (c).


The composite difference of the 500 mb height and SST field between pronounced positive and negative years (for 1985-93 based on the first zonal wind EOF) is shown in Figure 3. The height anomaly structure is similar to those of 1994 (Fig. 1), with a pronounced area of enhanced heights extending off the east coast of Asia, and wave pattern extending across North America and, Europe and Asia, while some difference is found over the Gulf of Alaska with a deeper trough in the composite. Fig. 3b shows that positive SST anomalies are most pronounced over the central North Pacific, and over the northwestern North Atlantic off the east coast of Canada. The resemblance to the July 1994 SST anomalies (not shown) is remarkable in the middle latitudes, while major differences are found in the tropical Pacific, suggesting that the connection of the middle latitude waves to the tropical SST forcing is likely insignificant.

Fig. 3. (a) The 200 mb height and (b) SST anomalies for the composite difference, represented as high minus low, based on the coefficients in Fig. 2(b). Contour interval is 20 meter in (a) and 0.5°C in (b). The zero contours are not drawn. Shading represents positive anomalies greater than 0.5°C in (b). Dotted lines represent the negative values.


Figure 4 shows the accumulated summer (July and August) rainfall over Korea for ten years (1985-1994). The interannual variation of the Korean rainfall has a clear quasi-bienial oscillation with alternating dry and wet conditions. Comparison of the Korean rainfall variations with those of the leading mode of the u-wind (Fig. 2b) shows an apparent linkage.

Fig. 4. Accumulated precipitation for July and August over Korea. Units are in mm.


5. Forcing mechanisms

While the above results suggest an SST connection to the zonal mean circulation anomalies in the middle latitudes, the forcing mechanism actually responsible for the development of the East Asian anticyclonic anomalies is not clear. As discussed by Frankignoul (1985) in his comprehensive review of air-sea feedback processes in the midlatitudes, numerous observational and modeling studies suggest that middle latiutude SST anomalies are ineffective at generating circulation anomalies. To examine this possibility we show in Figure 5 the time-lagged correlations between the weekly SST anomalies over the central North Pacific and 500 mb height anomalies for the warm season. The results show that the atmospheric anomalies are leading the SST anomalies by about 2 weeks. Thus it appears unlikely that the SST anomalies are initiating the atmospheric anomalies, though we have not ruled out the possibility that the SST anomalies, once established, are feeding back on the circulation.

Fig. 5. Lag correlation between the SST and 500 mb height anomalies during the warm season (May-September) over the central North Pacific (35°N- 45°N, 150°E-150°W). The abscissa represents the lag between the two time series in weeks; positive when height leads SST.


Next we consider the possibility that orographic forcing is playing a role. In climatology, the period between June and July is marked by a rapid northward shift of the jet between 30°N and 40°N latitude, suggesting substantial changes in the orographic forcing in this region. These changes in the zonal wind are accompanied by major reductions in the strength of the East Asian trough such that by late July the eddy height field becomes positive reflecting the East Asian anticyclone. The cross section of the June to July zonal wind changes are shown in Figure 6a. This shows clearly the northward shift of the jet with much weakened winds over the highest terrain and strengthened winds on the northern slopes. The July 1994 anomaly in the zonal wind for the same region is shown in Figure 6b. The anomalies indicate that 1994 experienced zonal wind anomalies similar in structure to the climatological change but much enhanced in amplitude. This shift in the jet is evidently produced by the anomalous and persistent 1994 Eurasian waves extending into this region (see Fig. 1). Thus both the climatological and anomalous changes in the zonal wind over Tibet likely have a similar impact on the orographic forcing.

Fig. 6. The latitude-pressure sections of the u-wind for (a) the climatology difference (July-June) and (b) July 1994 anomaly. The values are averaged over the western mountain terrain (60°E-90°E). Contour interval is 1 meter.


6. Discussion and conclusions

The multiyear global atmospheric data using a nonvarying assimilation system provide valuable information for understanding the nature of climate variation by removing the spuriouds variability due to algorithm changes. This study documents and analyzes the unusual evolution of the East Asian circulation during the summer of 1994 using the GEOS-1 assimilated data. The results show that the abnormal evolution of the seasonal cycle, which is associated with the early development of the upper level anticyclonic flow over East Asia, is responsible for the absence of the middle latitude monsoon rainfall (Changma in Korea and Baiu in Japan) during July. It is suggested that the enhancement of the typical late June and July orographic forcing is the primary cause of the premature development of the 1994 East Asian anticyclone which, by circumventing the normal July rainy season, lead to the East Asian drought. In the present case the orographic forcing is believed to be the result of the interaction with the anomalous Eurasian wave train extending into central Asia. This study suggests useful long-range predictions of the middle latitude monsoon rest on our ability to predict the occurrence of the Eurasian waves and their interaction with orography.


7. References

Frankignoul, C., 1985: Sea surface temperature anomalies, planetary waves, and air-sea feedback in the middle latitudes. Rev. Geophys., 23, 357-390.

Harshvardhan, R. Davies, D.A. Randall, and T.G. Corsetti, 1987: A fast radiation parameterization for atmospheric circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 1009-1016.

Helfand, H.M. and J.C. Labraga, 1988: Design of a non-singular level 2.5 second-order closure model for the prediction of atmospheric turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 113-132.

Moorthi, S. and M. J. Suarez, 1992: Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert: A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 978-1002.

Pfaendtner, J., S. Bloom, D. Lamich, M. Seablom, M. Sienkiewicz, J. Stobie and A. da Silva, 1995: Documentation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System-Version 1. NASA Tech. Memo. No. 104606, volume 4, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, pp 44, Jan 1995.

Suarez, M. J. and L. L. Takacs, 1995: Documentation of the Aries/GEOS Dynamical Core Version 2. NASA Tech. Memo. No. 104606, volume 5, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Takacs, L.L., A. Molod, and T. Wang, 1994: Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) general circulation model Version 1. NASA Tech. Memo. No. 104606, volume 1, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.


Dr. Chung-Kyu Park
Korea Meteorological Administration
1 Songwol-dong, Chongno-gu
Seoul 110-101, Korea
E-mail: park@nwpsvr.kma.go.kr